The Modified Cottontail Club
The Modified Cottontail Club
A bridge
bidding system based on the Cottontail Club system and Good, Better, Best.
Jan Eric
Larsson published a revolutionary book on conventions and systems: Good,
Better, Best. He tested many bidding systems and conventions using
thousands of computer simulations which led to startling results. It seems that
we now have an objective comparison of conventions and systems. One important
conclusion is that we should open a weak hand with any five card suit as a weak
two bid. The gain is approximately 0.2 IMPs per board compared with opening six
card suits only. On the other hand three level openings should be made on a
seven card suit, not on a six card suit. The conclusions on many conventions
and systems can be found in the book.
The best
system according to the book is “The Cottontail Club". Unfortunately there
is no extensive description available, only a summary of the opening bids. The
Cottontail Club is based on The Tangerine Club. A 20-page document on The
Tangerine Club can be found on the internet.
This
document describes a system named “The Modified Cottontail Club". I used
several conclusions from the book Good, Better, Best to The Cottontail
Club resulting in The Modified Cottontail Club. In summary these changes are:
- use strong NT openings,
- use opening bids that occur
frequently,
- use many natural bids.
Larsson
concluded that The Cottontail Club is the best system of the ones he tested and
the version with a 16+ 1♣ opening bid wins from the 15+ 1♣ opening. Replacing
the weak 1NT opening by a strong 1NT opening makes is logical to replace 16+ 1♣
opening by a 15+ 1♣ opening bid. Using this system you could expect a gain of
0.4 IMPs per board compared with a standard system. This equals to 10 IMPs per
match of 24 boards!
Table of
opening bids and responses:
Opening
bid |
HCP |
Meaning |
Responses |
1♣ |
15+ |
0+ ♣,
every 15+ HCP hand, except
1NT and 2NT hands |
As
Precision |
1♦ |
10-14 |
3+ ♦ |
standard |
1♥/♠ |
10-14 |
4+ ♥/♠,
canapé possible |
2♣ = relay |
1NT |
14-16 |
NT distribution |
standard |
2♣ |
10-14 |
5+ ♣,
four card ♥/♠ and 3325 possible |
2♦ = relay |
2♦/2♥/2♠ |
4-9 |
Any 5+
card, weak two |
2NT =
relay |
2NT |
20-22 |
NT distribution |
standard |
3♣/3♦/3♥/3♠ |
4-9 |
7+ card |
standard |
The NT
ladder is:
11-13 HCP:
open 1♦/1♥/♠/2♣
and rebid NT
14-16 HCP: open 1NT
17-19 HCP:
open 1♣ and rebid NT
20-22 HCP:
open 2NT
23+ HCP:
open 1♣ and jump rebid NT
For the
responses and rebids after the 1♣ opening you can choose any Precision variant.
For the responses and rebids after the 1♦, 1NT,
2NT and 3♣ and higher opening bids you can use a standard system, e.g. Stayman
and Jacoby transfers.
The 1♥/♠ openings can be bid on four card suit. The canapĂ©
principle is used for these opening bids. This means that your shortest suit
first is bid first. If your rebid is a second suit it should be at least five
cards. When using 2♣ as a relay the system could be like this:
Opening
bid |
Responses |
Rebid |
Meaning |
1♥ |
2♥ = 4+ ♥, 0-11 HCP |
|
The law
of total tricks |
|
1NT =
7-11 HCP |
|
To play |
|
2♣ = relay, 12+ HCP |
2♦ |
5+ ♦, unbalanced |
|
|
2♥ |
5+ ♥, balanced or unbalanced |
|
|
2♠ |
5+ ♠,
unbalanced |
|
|
2NT |
balanced |
1♠ |
2♠ = 4+
♠, 0-11 HCP |
|
The law
of total tricks |
|
1NT =
7-11 HCP |
|
To play |
|
2♣ = relay, 12+ HCP |
2♦ |
5+ ♦, unbalanced |
|
|
2♥ |
5+ ♥, unbalanced |
|
|
2♠ |
5+ ♠,
balanced or unbalanced |
|
|
2NT |
balanced |
The 2♣
opening bid differs from Precision, because a balanced distribution is
possible. The Precision approach can be adapted like this:
Opening
bid |
Response |
Rebid |
Meaning |
2♣ |
2♦ = relay, 12+ HCP |
2♥ |
5+ ♣
& 4 ♥ |
|
|
2♠ |
5+ ♣
& 4 ♠ |
|
|
2NT |
balanced |
|
|
3♣ |
6+ ♣ |
For the
weak two opening bids Larsson suggests the Ogust/ Blue Club responses, which is
an easy convention. I think it will be useful to adapt this system to
distinguish between five card and six card suits:
Opening
bid |
Response |
Rebid |
Meaning |
2♦/2♥/2♠ |
2NT =
relay, 16+ HCP |
3♣ |
4-6 HCP,
five card suit |
|
|
3♦ |
4-6 HCP,
six card suit |
|
|
3♥ |
7-9 HCP,
five card suit |
|
|
3♠ |
7-9 HCP,
six card suit |
The notes
above give only an outline of a system. In the Cottontail Club system the weak
two 2♦ opening is replaced by another weak
opening (a weak three-suited) compared with The Tangerine Club system. This can
be an improvement on the system above.
The book Good,
Better, Best and the Cottontail Club system deserve more attention and I
hope that these notes will help achieving this.
Daan van der Meij
Comments
Post a Comment